Legal Opinion
Vernon v. Vernon
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid Kuzuetz, J.
This is a motion by all of the defendants for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. In the alternative, defendant Jack Vernon seeks to modify plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial and to extend his time to serve a bill of particulars.
This is an action principally to impress a trust upon the outstanding stock in defendant, J. & V. Iron Works, Inc., to the extent of 25% of its total shares, and to require the plaintiff’s father, the defendant Jack Vernon, in whose name they are held, to issue or assign them to the plaintiff; to adjudge that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stevenson v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Denihan Enterprises, Inc. v. O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Abrams v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Schwartzreich v. . Bauman-Basch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Chiapparelli v. Baker, Kellogg & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adsit v. First Trust & Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Vernon v. VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957