Legal Opinion

Beadle v. Northrup

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1949No. Civ. 16474PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

In June, 1942, Jessie Northrup brought suit against John and Susan Wight for $2,500. On February 9, 1943, the day the trial commenced, Wight and his wife executed a note for $7,600 in favor of their daughter, Mildred Beadle, and a mortgage securing the note on a five-unit residential property in Whittier. Mrs. Northrup recovered judgment of some $2,900, and in 1945 purchased the property at execution sale. Mrs. Beadle brought the present action to foreclose the mortgage, Mrs. Northrup answered and filed a cross-complaint alleging that the note and mortgage had been given without consideration…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Fross v. WottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Allee v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Truelsen v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Hanscome-James-Winship v. AingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pope v. National Aero Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Xydias v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Gerry v. NorthrupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Northrup v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Wight v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API