Legal Opinion

In re Edgar L.

New York Family Court

Decided April 6, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob T. Zukermast, J.

A motion was made by the respondent in this juvenile delinquency proceeding to preclude the petitioner from giving evidence as to the items concerning which particu*143lars had not been provided pursuant to a demand for a bill of particulars. A cross motion was made by the petitioner for an order vacating the notice for the bill of particulars. The petitioner contends that bills of particulars are inappropriate to delinquency proceedings.

The question is whether a bill of particulars may be required in a juvenile delinquency proceeding. Section 165 of the Family Court Act states that: ‘ ‘ Where…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WhittingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. Ricci, New York County Courts1969
  4. In Re FloranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Matter of Edwin R.New York Family Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Utley, New York County Courts1974
  2. In re Eric K.New York City Family Court · 1979
  3. In re William S.New York Family Court · 1972
  4. In re Santos C.New York Family Court · 1971
  5. In re Anthony F.New York City Family Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API