Padgett v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CAMPBELL, Judge.
The Double Jeopardy Clause of our federal constitution protects a defendant from *56twice being placed in jeopardy for the same offense.1 Embodied within that guarantee is the doctrine of collateral estoppel — “the principle that bars relitigation between the same parties of issues actually determined at a previous trial.” Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 442, 445-46, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 1193, 1195, 25 L.Ed.2d 469, 474, 476 (1970). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether this federal doctrine…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McCambridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hathorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Havard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- David Ross Delap, Sr. v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Beltran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.