Legal Opinion

Padgett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 17, 1986No. 766-84PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The Double Jeopardy Clause of our federal constitution protects a defendant from *56twice being placed in jeopardy for the same offense.1 Embodied within that guarantee is the doctrine of collateral estoppel — “the principle that bars relitigation between the same parties of issues actually determined at a previous trial.” Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 442, 445-46, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 1193, 1195, 25 L.Ed.2d 469, 474, 476 (1970). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether this federal doctrine…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. McCambridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hathorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Havard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. David Ross Delap, Sr. v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Beltran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API