Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ward v. State.3

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 2015No. CR-00-1322Published

1DissentKaren R. Baker, Justice

Today, rather than acknowledge our own error in Ward’s postconviction case, the majority upends our precedents recognizing the unique procedural safeguards afforded to petitioners under a sentence of death. Ward’s petition for postconviction relief was unverified. As a result, neither the circuit court that denied it, nor this court had jurisdiction to address his claims. I cannot agree with the majority’s characterization of our decision rendered absent jurisdiction as enuring to Ward’s benefit. Ward is under a sentence of death and should receive the same procedural safeguards afforded to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Robbins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. First National Bank v. DalsheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Villines v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API