Legal Opinion

Chambers Development Company, Inc. v. Passaic County Utilities Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 14, 1995No. 94-3475PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

62 F.3d 582

CHAMBERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.; Conemaugh Township,

Somerset County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

v.

PASSAIC COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY,

Chambers Development Company, Inc., Appellant.

No. 94-3475.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued June 15, 1995.

Decided Aug. 14, 1995.

Michael R. Cole (argued), Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, Morristown, NJ, for appellant.

Jonathan L. Williams (argued), DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick & Gluck, Hackensack, NJ, for appellee.

Before: STAPLETON, McKEE, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

1

This appeal raises…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bak-A-Lum Corp. of America v. Alcoa Building Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. Lutz, David D. v. City of York, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Association Group Life, Inc. v. Catholic War Veterans of United StatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. Sarah Viger v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Couden v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Gibson v. Mayor And Council Of The City Of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. In Re Chambers Development Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. DL Resources, Inc. v. FirstEnergy Solutions Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Luis Trabal v. Wells Fargo Armored Service Corporation, Its Successors And/or Assigns Loomis Fargo Corporation John Does, 1-100, the Same Being Fictitious Abc Corp. (d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00858) Jerome Q. Ford v. Wells Fargo Armored Service Corporation, Its Successors And/or Assigns Loomis Fargo Corporation John Does 1-100, the Same Being Fictitious Abc Corporation, the Same Being Fictitious Individually, Jointly, Severally, Alternatively (d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00858) Wells Fargo Armored Service Corporation, Its Successor And/or Assigns, Loomis Fargo & Co., John Does 1-100, the Same Being Fictitious, and Abc Corporation, 1-10, the Same Being Fictitious Individually, Jointly, Severally, AlternativelyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API