Federal Copper & Aluminum Co. v. Wright
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHATTIN, Justice.
We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court; that is, Cecil Wright as the plaintiff and Federal Copper & Aluminum Company and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company as the defendants.
*958This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial judge awarding plaintiff workmen’s compensation benefits of ninety-five per cent permanent partial disability to his left hand.
Defendants perfected this appeal and insist plaintiff’s injuries were limited to the fingers of his left hand only and it was error for the trial judge to award him compensation benefits for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Rockwell v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Chapman v. Clement Brothers, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- S. C. Weber Iron & Steel Co. v. JefferyTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Lambert Bros. v. DishnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Standard Glass Co. v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pipe v. Leese Tool & Die Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Eaton Corp. v. QuillenTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Davis Blasting Co. v. RobertsTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
- Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. v. A. J. King Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Godwin v. Morgan Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.