Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Hoskins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1968PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Humphreys

We brought this case here to consider whether counsel for a defendant in a partition suit, where the property is sold for partition, is entitled under T.C.A. sec. 23-2125 to have his fee paid out of the common fund.

In a suit to partition property belonging equally to complainants and defendants, without reference to any conducive facts, the chancellor awarded fees to complainant’s counsel in the amount of $1,500.00, to the exclusion of defense counsel, but ordered that $750.00 of this award would be retained in court to pay defense counsel should they prevail on appeal in their insistence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott v. MarleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tennessee Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. Parker v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Earhart v. City of BristolTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Roberson v. University of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Chaille v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API