Legal Opinion

Novak v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 1990No. 1353 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

Victor and Thelma Novak (Novaks) petition for review of a decision of the Board of Property (Board) denying a request requiring the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) to convey a certain parcel of property to the Novaks by granting an order for specific performance.

To accomplish the construction of Interstate 279 (1-279), PennDOT condemned certain residential and commercial properties owned by the Novaks. To settle these condemnation cases, PennDOT and the Novaks entered into an agreement on October 31, 1981, where, in addition to monetary compensation, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. E. J. Albrecht Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. Mosites Construction Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. COM., PENNSYLVANIA GAME COM'N v. UlrichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. McCullough v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. L. C. Anderson & Sons, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. E-Z Parks, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Public School Bldg. Auth. v. QuandelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Penn Township v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API