Wickham v. Trapani
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtIsadore Bookstein, J.
This action .by plaintiff is for a declaratory judgment, declaring constitutional article 25 of the Agriculture and Markets Law, and other incidental relief.
In the amended answer, defendant seeks a declaration that said article 25 is unconstitutional. However, in his opening statement, counsel for defendant stated that this was a mistake and that he seeks only a declaration that section 294 (subd. [2], par. [d]) of said article be declared unconstitutional.
Defendant seeks also a declaration that the Apple Marketing Order, promulgated by plaintiff, pursuant to article 25, is unconstitutional,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Townsend v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- C. v. Floyd Fruit Co. v. Florida Citrus CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Graham v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Totalisator Co. v. Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Wickham v. TrapaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Barber v. BullardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Opinion No. (1981), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1981
- Opinion No. (1984), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.