Legal Opinion

Wickham v. Trapani

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIsadore Bookstein, J.

This action .by plaintiff is for a declaratory judgment, declaring constitutional article 25 of the Agriculture and Markets Law, and other incidental relief.

In the amended answer, defendant seeks a declaration that said article 25 is unconstitutional. However, in his opening statement, counsel for defendant stated that this was a mistake and that he seeks only a declaration that section 294 (subd. [2], par. [d]) of said article be declared unconstitutional.

Defendant seeks also a declaration that the Apple Marketing Order, promulgated by plaintiff, pursuant to article 25, is unconstitutional,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Townsend v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. C. v. Floyd Fruit Co. v. Florida Citrus CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. Graham v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Totalisator Co. v. Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Wickham v. TrapaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. Barber v. BullardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Opinion No. (1981), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1981
  5. Opinion No. (1984), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API