Altschul v. Casey
Oregon Supreme Court
From Crook: W. L. Bradshaw, Judge. Action by Charles Altschul against William T. Casey relative to the ownership of real property, the plaintiff claiming through legal conveyances from the general gov-eminent, and the defendant by adverse possession. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton
After introducing a patent from the United States to the Willamette Valley & Cascade Mountain Wagon Road Company, plaintiff introduced a deed from the company to H. K. W. Clark, with reference to which two questions arose: first, whether it was admissible without showing aliunde that the company was an incorporation; and, second, whether it was legally executed. It purports on its face to be an indenture “between the Willamette Valley and Cascade Mountain Wagon Road Company, a body corporate under the laws of the State of Oregon, party of the first part, and H. K. W. Clark, * * party of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parkersburg Industrial Co. v. SchultzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
- James Greenleaf's Lessee v. BirthSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Holbrook v. NicholIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Zeringue v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
- Moore v. Willamette Transportation & Locks Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stern v. LiebermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Anderson v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Smith v. BaduraOregon Supreme Court · 1914