Legal Opinion

In re Wade

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 6, 2018No. CASE NO. 15BK01035PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LaShonda A. Hunt, United States Bankruptcy Judge

At issue here is the scope of the termination of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3). Debtors, Harold and Lorraine Wade, assert that stay termination is limited to property of the debtors only , and, as such, creditor Kreisler Law P.C. ("Kreisler") should be sanctioned under § 362(k) for obtaining and recording a post-petition state court judgment against their personal residence. Kreisler, on the other hand, contends that the stay terminated as to property of the debtors and property of the estate, and, accordingly, seeks an order…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
  2. Reswick v. Reswick (In Re Reswick)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Holcomb v. Hardeman (In Re Holcomb)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. In Re PaschalUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
  5. In Re JumppBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Financial Bank v. ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  2. Harold G. Wade, Jr., et al. v. Kreisler Law P.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  3. In re: Antoinette PinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  4. Marilyn May Sloniker and Pedro Balderramo JustoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API