In re Wade
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LaShonda A. Hunt, United States Bankruptcy Judge
At issue here is the scope of the termination of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3). Debtors, Harold and Lorraine Wade, assert that stay termination is limited to property of the debtors only , and, as such, creditor Kreisler Law P.C. ("Kreisler") should be sanctioned under § 362(k) for obtaining and recording a post-petition state court judgment against their personal residence. Kreisler, on the other hand, contends that the stay terminated as to property of the debtors and property of the estate, and, accordingly, seeks an order…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Reswick v. Reswick (In Re Reswick)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Holcomb v. Hardeman (In Re Holcomb)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- In Re PaschalUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- In Re JumppBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Financial Bank v. ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Harold G. Wade, Jr., et al. v. Kreisler Law P.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
- In re: Antoinette PinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Marilyn May Sloniker and Pedro Balderramo JustoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025