Legal Opinion
Holcomb v. Hardeman (In Re Holcomb)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 7, 2008No. BAP No. WO-07-084. Bankruptcy No. 07-11331PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McFEELEY, Chief Judge.
Appellants/Debtors, Aleshia Holcomb and Bradley Holcomb, appeal an order of the bankruptcy court of the Western District of Oklahoma contending that the bankruptcy court erred under 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(A) 1 when it concluded that the stay imposed on the filing of their case terminated with respect to the property of the estate on the thirtieth day after the initiation of their case. Because the language of § 362(c)(3)(A) terminates the stay only with respect to the debtor, we reverse and remand to the bankruptcy court.
1. Background
On June 3, 2005, Debtors…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- In Re PaschalUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Rupp v. United Security Bank (In Re Kunz)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Reswick v. Reswick (In Re Reswick)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Smith v. ME Bureau of Revenue ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- In Re DanielUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Rinard v. Positive Investments, Inc. (In Re Rinard)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2011
- In re BenderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2016
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.