Franklin Insurance v. Wolff
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Laporte Superior Court; A. C. Capron, Special Judge. Action by Charles "Wolff against the Eranklin Insurance Company. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, P. J.
The appellee formally and earnestly insists upon the enforcement against the appellant of rule twenty-two of this court, relating to briefs and arguments (Ewbank’s Manual, lii), and directs our attention to particular insufficiencies of the brief of the appellant. That rule requires that the brief of appellant shall contain a short and clear statement disclosing certain matters numbered and specified; and it is contended that the brief of the appellant in this cause is not prepared in compliance with these requirements, which we must notice in their order.
“(1) The nature of the action.” While…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Witte v. WITTEIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SnowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Inland Steel Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Struble-Werneke Motor Co. v. Metropolitan Securities Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- Grand Rapids Motor Express, Inc. v. CrosbieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.