Legal Opinion

Weed v. Weed

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 28, 2008No. 2007-338PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. This appeal arises out of an ongoing land dispute among members of the Weed family. Jane Weed appeals the trial court’s rulings as to two intra-family land transfers involving Jane, her mother Leah, her brother James and sister-in-law Cynthia, and their children. We reverse.

¶ 2. The following facts were found by the superior court or are uncontroverted. In 1916, the Weed family acquired two contiguous parcels of land — a 103.4-acre tract in Enosburg, Vermont and a 63.6-acre tract in Sheldon, Vermont. When this dispute began in 1996, both parcels were owned by Leah and the late Leonard…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Philpot v. GruningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Quenneville v. ButtolphSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Department of Corrections v. Matrix Health Systems, P.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. Bergeron v. BoyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  5. Legault v. LegaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. ShusherebaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. Prue v. Royer, Sr., and Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Ferrisburgh Realty Investors v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  4. Nystrom and Nystrom v. HaffordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. Shattuck v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API