Legal Opinion
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Newby
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1946No. 11137PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a claim for damages for wrongful death growing out of che overturn of an automobile owned by appellant and driven by its employee, Hair. On a former appeal, Reynolds Tobacco Co. et al. v. Newby, 9 Cir., 145 F.2d 768, we reversed a judgment against appellant and its district supervisor, Donnelly, and remanded the cause for a new trial. On the second trial there was a verdict and judgment against appellant alone.
A number of the points now argued were discussed in the former opinion and decided adversely to appellant. There is no need to go over them…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crowell v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Department of Water and Power v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HetzerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- V. L. Nicholson Const. Co. v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Fleckner v. DionneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Fleckner v. DionneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949