Legal Opinion

Fleckner v. Dionne

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1949No. Civ. 14142Published

1Opinion of the Court

94 Cal.App.2d 246 (1949)

WILBUR G. FLECKNER et al., Appellants,

v.

EDWARD G. DIONNE, a Minor, etc., et al., Defendants; P. D PANGRACS, Respondent.

Civ. No. 14142.

California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. Two.

Oct. 20, 1949.

Joseph A. Bonacina for Appellants.

Robert L. Lamb and Robert A. Haughwout for Respondent.

GOODELL, Acting P. J.

The demurrer of respondent Pangracs, sued as Richard Roe, was sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiffs declined to amend, and judgment was entered that plaintiffs take nothing as against Pangracs, from which this appeal was taken.

The complaint is in three counts. It…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Cruse v. AdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Crowell v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. McEvoy v. American Pool Corp.California Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Mitchell v. ChurchesWashington Supreme Court · 1922

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API