State v. Bruggerman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Bamsey county, Simons, J., presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtYanderburgh, J.
The defendant was prosecuted criminally for obstructing a highway in the town of Bose, Bamsey county. The questions involved are the validity of “An act to legalize certain roads or highways in the county of Bamsey,” approved March 3, 1879,. *494(being Sp. Laws 1879, c. 226,) and its application to the road in question. This act is similar in character and purpose to the one (Sp. Laws 1878, c. 191,) which was considered in the case of State v. Messenger, 27 Minn. 119. We think the conclusion reached in that case and the doctrine there laid down must govern the decision of this case.
As shown by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. MessengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martin v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Hall v. Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Tissino v. MavrakisWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Electric Short Line Terminal Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Banse v. Town of ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.