Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Fairlamb

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1898No. 3790PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—-Hon. William E. Richardson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*604The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Gordon, J.

Appellant is the executrix of the estate of H. T. Fairlamb, deceased. Respondent’s action is upon a promissory note executed by said Fairlamb and various other parties, but appellant was the only defendant served with process or who appeared in the action. The answer alleged a failure to present the claim prior to the commencement of the action. The court, among other things, found as follows:

“ 3d. That no notice to creditors of said estate of any character or description whatever, was published or given by said executrix, requiring such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donnerberg v. OppenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ward v. MagahaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Delfelder v. Farmers' State Bank of RivertonWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Harvey v. PocockWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. In re the Estate of CurtisWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ash v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API