Legal Opinion

Ruth Fisher Elementary School District v. Buckeye Union High School District

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 12, 2002No. 1 CA-CV 01-0133PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, J.

¶ 1 For favorable funding purposes, appellant Buckeye Union High School District (Buckeye) enrolled high school students residing in appellee Ruth Fisher Elementary School District (Fisher) as open enrollment students rather than as tuition students. In an action seeking clarification filed by Fisher, the trial court ruled that Buckeye must enroll Fisher students as tuition students. We hold that the open enrollment tuition policies outlined in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 15-816.01 (Supp.2001) do not apply to high school students living in a common school…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Mercy Healthcare Arizona, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Hibbs v. Chandler Ginning Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Board of Trustees of Mary E. Dill School District No. 51 v. Board of Education of Sahuarita High SchoolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Flowing Wells School District v. Vail School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCloud v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Laurie Freeman, Sharon Mockmore, Beccy Boysel, Gary D. Boysel, Linda L. Goreham, Gary R. Goreham, Kelcey Brackett, and Bobbie Lynn Weatherman v. Grain Processing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Pleak v. Entrada Property Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Johnson v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. Democratic Party of Pima County v. Beth Ford Pima County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API