Southern Pac. Co. v. Harada
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the .Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge.
This is an action to recover damages for injuries received by the defendant in error from the negligence of the plaintiff in error in running its train at a street crossing in Alameda, Cal. The jury before whom the case was tried found a verdict in favor of the defendant in error. There is test imony in the record to the effect that the railroad crossing at Everell street *380and Railroad avenue was a hazardous and dangerous one; that the south track extended beyond Everett street, and finally ran into the north track; that it curved for the entire distance: that on account…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Elliott v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wing v. Western Pacific R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Loose v. LarsenNevada Supreme Court · 1916