Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 1997No. C6-96-1183, CX-96-1588PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the Henne-pin County District Court denying, without holding an evidentiary hearing, petitioner James (NMN) Russell’s petition for postcon-viction relief. Russell was convicted of first-degree felony murder and second-degree intentional murder. This court affirmed Russell’s conviction on direct appeal. In his postconviction petition, Russell alleges four claimed trial errors: insufficient evidence to convict, failure to produce evidence at trial, violation of privilege against self-incrimination, and ineffective assistance of counsel.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Case v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Black v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Dobbins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Sutherlin v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API