Legal Opinion

Soto v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 11, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Department of Motor Vehicles dated October 16, 1991, which affirmed a decision of an Administrative Law Judge, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner had refused to submit to a chemical test in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194, revoking the petitioner’s driver’s license, and imposing a civil penalty of $200.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Collins v. CoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Stark v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Matter of Stark v. New York State Dep't of Motor VehiclesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Giampia v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Allen v. BaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Mabins v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Iovino v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Matter of Tunstall v. New York State Dept. of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API