Matter of Stark v. New York State Dep't of Motor Vehicles
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194, determined that the warrantless arrest here was justified by exigent circumstances. The record demonstrates that there was an uninterrupted pursuit of petitioner by the police and that the intrusion into his home was necessary to enable them to attempt to ascertain petitioner’s blood alcohol level within the two-hour time limit prescribed by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194. On this record, the warrantless arrest was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Scott-Reitz Ltd. v. Rein Warsaw AssociatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Olivieri v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- People v. OdenwellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. ElyseeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.