Legal Opinion

Senior v. New York City Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 1906PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Hugh H. Senior, from, an order of the) Appellate Ter-m of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of June, 1905, as resettled by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 16th day of August, 1905, affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of the defendant, dismissing the complaint upon the merits,

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The plaintiff was a passenger upon the defendant’s railroad on Lexington avenue. At Forty-second street he requested a transfer *40from the Lexington avenub line entitling him to ride upon the Forty-second Street, Man'hattanville and St.. Bichólas Avenue'railway so as to carry the'plain tiff' over that road without the payment of additional fare. This demand was refused. Plaintiff then boarded the Forty-second street car, but was required to pay his fare, and he brings this action to recover/the penalty imposed by • section 39 of the' Railroad Law (Laws of 1890, chap. 565) for a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Pagel, Horton & Co. v. Harmon Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. State v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Stone v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Bull v. New York City Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API