Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Hugo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following is the opinion of the court below:

Larkin, George A., J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to set aside, because of fraud, certain agreements made with the defendant Hugo, in which the Interstate Mortgage Corporation was interested, and to compel the defendant Hugo to return securities deposited with him in connection with the contracts.

To appreciate properly the evidence it is necessary to understand the position of Hugo and the mental makeup of Copeland at the time it is asserted by the plaintiff that the fraud was practiced upon him.

Prior to June, 1922, the defendant Hugo had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deyo v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Barnes v. StarrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Shaw v. . BroadbentNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Copeland v. HugoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Satterwhite v. Harriman Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  2. People v. CarthenNew York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API