Legal Opinion
United States v. Mahaney
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 3, 1939No. 21184-RPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
The Government seeks a temporary injunction to prevent the use by defendants, in pending adversary litigation, of confidential information obtained by William J. Mahaney while in the employ of the Government, Mahaney having been recently hired by defendant Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, hereinafter called the bank.
The motion was heard upon the verified complaint and supporting affidavits; answers of defendants other than Mahaney, affidavits in opposition, and the “consent” of Mahaney.
On November 22, 1938, the Securities and Exchange Commission…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
- In re BooneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
- United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Juvenile Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allied Realty of St. Paul v. Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Allied Realty of St. Paul, Inc. v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago, Sidney P. Abramson, Intervenor-Appellant. Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Allied Realty of St. Paul, Inc., Sidney P. Abramson, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Allied Realty of St. Paul, Inc. v. Exchange National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980