Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
625 F.2d 433
51 A.L.R.Fed. 646, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,542
Michael F. ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Clovis McALPIN, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 745, Docket 79-7042.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Submitted to the En Banc Court Feb. 22, 1980.
Decided June 20, 1980.
Gordon, Hurwitz, Butowsky, Baker, Weitzen & Shalov, New York City (Franklin B. Velie, Paul D. Wexler, Bruce Siegel, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellees.
Barrett Smith Schapiro Simon & Armstrong, New York City (Michael F. Armstrong, Martin F. Richman, Eric T. Singer, New York City, Susan L.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Mulligan; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Graafeiland; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Newman.
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.