Legal Opinion

Cleveland Trust Co. v. Ingalls

Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Decided February 27, 1963No. 626680Published

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Chief Referee.

This ease concerns the right of a corporate trustee of a testamentary trust to retain as part of the trust estate an interest in a limited partnership assigned to it by the executors of the testator’s estate.

By Item Y of his will, Albert S. Ingalls, Jr., left his residuary estate in trust, designating The Cleveland Trust Company as trustee. The interest in the limited partnership was assigned to The Cleveland Trust Company as part.of the residuary estate distributed to the trustee by the executors.

The action is brought by The Cleveland Trust Company as trustee, seeking…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fechteler v. Palm Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  2. Bennett v. Sinclair Refining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. WehrmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Catskill Bank v. Horace Gray & the Ulster Iron Co.New York Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Marnet Oil & Gas Co. v. StaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API