Legal Opinion

Madjorous v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

The plaintiff in error some time since was granted leave to file his petition in error in this court, which was accordingly done. He was indicted by the grand jury of Summit county, at the September term, 1923, of the court of common pleas, for manufacturing intoxicating liquor in violation of Section 6212-15, G-eneral Code, as amended in January, 1923 (110 Ohio Laws, p. 49). He was duly arraigned upon said indictment and entered a plea of not guilty. Subsequently he was tried by a petit jury, and found guilty as charged in the indictment, and at a later date was sentenced to the state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. People Ex Rel. Forsyth v. . Court of SessionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Schario v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State ex rel. Harrison v. MenaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Kimball v. SweetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CraftOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. City of Lakewood v. DaviesOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. ParksOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API