United States v. Campbell
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Per curiam
We have examined the record of trial, the assignment of error1 and the Government’s reply thereto, and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.
Appellant was tried by special court-martial, officer members. Contrary to his pleas, he was convicted of a single specification under Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 921, alleging the theft of 13 Nintendo game tapes.2 He was sentenced to reduction to pay grade E-l and to a bad-conduct…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.