Legal Opinion

Roberts v. . Merritt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Oueiam.

Tbe clerk made an order extending tbe time for filing tbe answer, but not to a day certain, as tbe statute requires. Public Laws 1921, Extra Session, cb. 92, sec. 1 (3). After tbe statutory time for filing tbe answer bad expired, tbe clerk permitted tbe answer to be filed, and tbe plaintiff excepted. Tbe case was tben transferred to tbe civil issue docket.

Whether tbe clerk’s order extending tbe time for answering without naming a “day certain” was invalid or merely irregular we need not now determine. In tbe Superior Court tbe plaintiff twice procured a continuance of tbe cause;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McNair v. . YarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Dunn v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. King v. . RuddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Howard v. . HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Smith v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API