Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 15, 1852PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Parish of St. Landry, Overton, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSlidell, J.

The exception pleaded by the defendant and which vims overruled by the Court below, involves the proposition that a man may lawfully agree with another to limit his responsibility in damages for a future offence against such person’s good name. Such a doctrine is as inadmissible as it is novel. It is manifestly inconsistent with public policy that a man should he permitted to stipulate a partial impunity for the commission of a future immoral act.

Such being our opinion, it is unnecessary to inquire whether the motion to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the judgment was not final, was…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Louisiana and Arkansas Railway CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Elmer v. CoplinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Poplar Grove Planting & Refining Co. v. Bache Halsey Stuart Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1979
  4. Bowman v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Battig v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API