Legal Opinion

Reidy v. City of Syracuse

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZoller, J.

Although plaintiff has named as defendants in his action the city of Syracuse, its mayor, its clerk, the president of its common council and nineteen aldermen, and also Joseph Stolusky, service of his summons and complaint has been made only upon the clerk and the president of the common council. For these two defendants the corporation counsel of the city appears generally and for the other defendants appears specially.

Plaintiff evidently has brought his action pursuant to the provisions of section 51 of the General Municipal Law. In other words, his action is what is commonly known as a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Talcott v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Bachman v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Bareham v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. McCann v. . Chasm Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Gray v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koeppel v. SouthardNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Reidy v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API