Legal Opinion

Winslow v. Nolan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 2010No. ED 93544PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Presiding Judge.

Introduction

Defendant Tom Nolan (Nolan) appeals from a judgment awarding Plaintiff Charles Winslow (Winslow) damages stemming from undivided profits and unjust enrichment on Winslow’s claim of an equal partnership interest in a plumbing business. The trial court found that Nolan and Winslow had agreed to share equally the profits earned from their plumbing partnership, that the profits had not been equally divided, and that Nolan was unjustly enriched by accepting the benefits of Winslow’s labor, knowledge and experience. Because we find no substantial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. MC Development Co. v. Central R-3 School District of St. Francois CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Meyer v. LofgrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Nesler v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. In Re the Competency of ParkusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reyner v. CrawfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Clark v. FrancisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Consolidated Grain & Barge, Co. v. HobbsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Autumn Lakes Association v. Jame Q. Tran, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and TSJ Holdings, LLC, Third-Party Intervenor-Respondent/Cross-Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Bader Farms, Inc. v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API