People v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland. (Moore, J.) Debt to collect penalty for failure to provide a residence crossing under Act No. 165, Iiaws of 1889. Defend.ant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The people bring their suit under Act No. 165, Laws of 1889, to recover a penalty for the failure *472of the defendant to provide an open, unobstructed residence crossing, suitably guarded, in front of the residence buildings of one Henry Fall, in the township of Bloomfield, Oakland county. Judgment was rendered against the defendant for $140, and it appeals.
The following facts were stipulated, and constitute all the evidence that was introduced upon the trial, viz.:
“1. That the defendant is a corporation, and owns and operates a railroad between the city of Detroit and the city of Grand Haven,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rapids v. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. HoughMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Grand Rapids, Newaygo & Lake Shore Railroad v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Whitney v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peterson v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HughesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hustina v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Chamberlain v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907