Cedar Crest 10, Inc. v. City of Dallas
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARNOT, Justice.
Claiming an apartment building is a public nuisance, the City of Dallas seeks demolition of the building pursuant to DALLAS, TEX., REV.CITY CODE ch. 27 (1960). The owner, Cedar Crest # 10, Inc., appeals the trial court’s finding that the building is a nuisance and its order for demolition, asserting (1) that Chapter 27 is unconstitutional, (2) there was no trial on the merits, and (3) that the City’s action is barred by estoppel. We disagree. Because Chapter 27 provides for a judicial determination of the fact of nuisance, the judgment reflects a hearing on the merits…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Long v. KnoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Lane v. Fair Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
- Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Guthrie v. National Homes CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Dallas v. Heather StewartTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Dallas v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Jayanti Patel v. City of Everman, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- Jayanti Patel v. City of Everman, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- Jayanti Patel v. City of Everman, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.