Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Dallas v. Stewart

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2012No. 09-0257Published

1Dissent

Justice JOHNSON,

joined by Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice GREEN, and Justice GUZMAN, dissenting.

The finding by Dallas’s Urban Rehabilitation Standards Board (URSB) that Heather Stewart’s property was a nuisance, when affirmed by the trial court, should have determined the nuisance question and precluded its relitigation. Because the Court holds otherwise, I respectfully dissent.

I. General

Statutory requirements afford significant safeguards to property owners whose property a city seeks to abate as a public nuisance. See Tex. Loc. Gov’t Code chs. 54, 214. Stewart does not claim that Dallas’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steele v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Igal v. Brightstar Information Technology Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Brazosport Saving & Loan Ass'n v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API