City of Dallas v. Stewart
Texas Supreme Court
1Dissent
Justice JOHNSON,
joined by Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice GREEN, and Justice GUZMAN, dissenting.
The finding by Dallas’s Urban Rehabilitation Standards Board (URSB) that Heather Stewart’s property was a nuisance, when affirmed by the trial court, should have determined the nuisance question and precluded its relitigation. Because the Court holds otherwise, I respectfully dissent.
I. General
Statutory requirements afford significant safeguards to property owners whose property a city seeks to abate as a public nuisance. See Tex. Loc. Gov’t Code chs. 54, 214. Stewart does not claim that Dallas’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steele v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Igal v. Brightstar Information Technology Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Brazosport Saving & Loan Ass'n v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.