Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Slaughter v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1981No. 5439Published

1ConcurrenceRooney, Justice

I concur with the majority opinion but I want to point more specifically to the language of § 6-8-301, W.S.1977, Cum.Supp. 19801 and to the fact that the legislature used the words “imprisoned or confined” to mean two different things.

“ * * * We must give effect, if possible, to every word, clause and sentence of the statute. * * * The word ‘or’ is usually used in the disjunctive sense, and when two clauses are expressed in the disjunctive, this generally indicates alternatives, requiring separate treatment. [Citations.] In other words, the subject of each clause should be considered…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. DeHerrera v. HerreraWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. BausewineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. State Board of ControlWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Yeik v. Department of Revenue & TaxationWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ex Parte CainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API