Slaughter v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceRooney, Justice
I concur with the majority opinion but I want to point more specifically to the language of § 6-8-301, W.S.1977, Cum.Supp. 19801 and to the fact that the legislature used the words “imprisoned or confined” to mean two different things.
“ * * * We must give effect, if possible, to every word, clause and sentence of the statute. * * * The word ‘or’ is usually used in the disjunctive sense, and when two clauses are expressed in the disjunctive, this generally indicates alternatives, requiring separate treatment. [Citations.] In other words, the subject of each clause should be considered…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- DeHerrera v. HerreraWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BausewineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. State Board of ControlWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Yeik v. Department of Revenue & TaxationWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Ex Parte CainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.