Commonwealth v. Rosado
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGants, C.J.
*654 **540 The issue on appeal concerns the scope of the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing. In Commonwealth v. Edwards , 444 Mass. 526 , 540, 830 N.E.2d 158 (2005), we held that a defendant forfeits the right to object to the admission in evidence of an unavailable witness's out-of-court statements on both confrontation and hearsay grounds if the Commonwealth proves by a preponderance of the evidence that "(1) the witness is unavailable; (2) the defendant was involved in, or responsible for, procuring the unavailability of the witness; and (3) the defendant acted with **541 the intent to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Giles v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. HoulihanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FontanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. Elana GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026