Legal Opinion

Keller v. Hall

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1940No. 9195PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This suit was before this court on a former appeal. Then, as now, the appellant was H. W. Keller, who, acting on behalf of Las Mercedes Copper Mining Company and San Manuel Mines Company, two corporations organized under the laws of the Republic of Mexico, had entered into a contract with the- appellee, James M. Hall, for the operation and exploitation of certain mining properties in Mexico. That contract provided in part that Hall was to take possession of the *130properties, erect a mill thereon, and pay a guaranteed royalty.

This suit was brought by the appellant against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butler v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. South Spring Hill Gold Mining Co. v. Amador Medean Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Cutler v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Khadr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  2. Bove v. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
  3. Seguros Tepeyac, S. A., Compania Mexicana De Seguros Generales v. James L. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. National Nut Co. of California v. Kelling Nut Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
  5. Lim v. Motor Supply, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API