Legal Opinion

York Haven W. & P. Co. v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1926No. Appeal, 224PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The question raised by this appeal , is of considerable importance. It concerns the right of an electric light, heat and power company to purchase or merge with a hydro-electric or water power company. Both are public service concerns, owing duties to the public. The tendency of the day is to consolidate the former companies and construct if possible hydro plants as a supplemental energy. This result prevents great economic waste and makes possible more efficient service at reduced rates to the public. The part which the hydro plants play in this system is doubly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fogelsville & Trexlertown Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Pennsylvania Utilities Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Canal CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
  4. Kane & Elk Railroad v. Pittsburgh & Western R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Hey v. Springfield Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Buist's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  4. City Transfer Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. First Union National Bank v. Quality Carriers Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API