Stewart v. Silva
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Concurrence
LENNON, J., Concurring.
I concur in the conclusion of Mr. Justice Wilbur, which results in a reversal of the judgment in this case, primarily for the reason that it is the general rule that the uncontradicted and unimpeached testimony of a witness tending to establish, an issuable fact in the ease may not be arbitrarily disregarded by the trial court. (Hayward v. Rogers, 62 Cal. 348, 372; Gage v. Billing, 12 Cal. App. 688 [108 Pac. 664], 10 Cal. Jur., p. 1143.) To the contrary, such testimony must be accepted as proof of the fact which it is offered to establish unless it can be said that such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hynes v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Gage v. BillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Hayward v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Williams v. CovillaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Hutchison v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.