Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Evins
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided March 30, 1995No. 13-95-030-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEERDEN, Chief Justice.
Allstate Insurance Company and its adjusters, Cynthia Cabaza and Diana Guerra, bring this mandamus action to the trial court to sever contractual from extra-contractual claims brought against them by Rene Cano and Jose Luis Barrera, in a lawsuit involving an auto collision. We deny mandamus relief.
Cano and Barrera sustained injuries in a collision with an uninsured motorist and made claim for benefits from Allstate based on their uninsured motorist policy. After negotiation failed to produce an acceptable settlement, Cano and Barrera brought suit against Allstate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Womack v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Millard, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Avary v. Bank of America, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- in Re American National County Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
- In Re Allstate Texas Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
- In Re Koehn, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.