Legal Opinion
Miller v. Lautenburg
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCardozo, J.
The plaintiff, the Alien Property Custodian, made a contract with the defendant for the sale of land and buildings in the city of New York. The purchaser refused the tendered deed upon the ground that the seller's title was unmarketable. The Appellate Division upon an agreed statement of the facts overruled the objections and sustained the title. The case is here after the allowance of an appeal.
In July, 1918, A. Mitchell Palmer, then the Alien Property Custodian, determined that Ernst Haertel, the record owner of this property, was an enemy alien. Following this determination, he prepared a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Commercial Trust Co. of NJ v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coler v. Corn Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Brownell v. Union & New Haven Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- In re the Estate of CarringtonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re the Estate of LittmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of DreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.