Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Littman
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 28, 1941PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The issues in the contested accounting proceeding are disposed of as follows:(1) The United States government, by formal stipulation filed, has withdrawn any right to demand or collect the share of Julius A. W. Littmann and Ella Littmann Caro under article H of the thirteenth clause of the will and has conceded that no demand was served by the Alien Property Custodian on the executors seizing the interests of such persons under that part of the will. The payment of their respective shares is accordingly directed to be made to each of them.(2) A different situation is presented as to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- In re the Estate of BendheimNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of DreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Miller v. LautenburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- In re SchaeferNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brownell v. GebhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- In re the Estate of CarringtonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- Estate of SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- In re Accounting of FredericksNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- Herrmann v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.