Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. City of San Bernardino
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 9, 2000No. EDCV00-107RT(RNBX)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT.
TIMLIN, District Judge.
The Court, the Honorable Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered Defendants City of San Bernardino, San Bernar-dino Peace Officer Brennan, San Bernardi-no Peace Officer Green, San Bernardino Peace Officer Johnson, San Bernardino Peace Officer Lewis, and Does 1 through 10 (“Defendants”)’s motion to dismiss portions of Plaintiff La France Hamilton (“Plaintiff’)’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Walker v. KiousisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. StanistreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Eakins v. NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2002
- Hamilton v. City of San BernardinoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- State v. EnglishElyria Municipal Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.