Legal Opinion

Mount Lucas Associates, Inc. v. MG Refining & Marketing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 24, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Andrias, J.

Plaintiff, Mount Lucas Associates, is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 USC § 80b-1 et seq.) and a commodity trading adviser and commodity pool operator registered under the Commodity Exchange *247Act (7 USC § 1 et seq.). Defendant and third-party plaintiff, MG Refining and Marketing, Inc., which is no longer in business, was, at the time in question, engaged in the business of investing, purchasing, selling, trading and participating in the oil futures and options market and in the purchase and resale of crude oil and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Life Partners, Incorporated and Brian D. PardoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Revak v. SEC Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mane v. BruscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Opinion No. (2005), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API