Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Scannell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 24, 1982No. 4921-3-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

One issue is presented: Did the court err in granting a motion for default when the party against whom the motion was made did not file an answer within the time required by CR 12(a) but moved to dismiss the complaint before the motion for default was heard? We hold it did, and reverse.

On June 12, 1981, a third party complaint by William G. Scannell was served on Lawrence M. Ross and his wife. Mr. Ross entered an appearance on July 1. On July 6, Mr. Scannell filed a motion for default, which was set for hearing July 13. On July 10, Mr. Ross, pursuant to CR 12(b)(6), 1 moved to dismiss the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. BalesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
  2. Sunshine Kitchens, Inc. v. Alanthus Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of PennamenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Sanderson v. UNIVERSITY VILLAGECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. In re the Marriage of OwenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API