Prus v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PLUNKETT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Louis Prus and the Northwest Side Real Estate Board bring a constitutional challenge to Defendant City of Chicago’s ordinance regulating commercial advertising in certain residential neighborhoods. Currently before us is Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we find the ordinance to be unconstitutional, and therefore grant summary judgment on the constitutional issue. The issues of damages and attorney’s fees, however, are reserved for later determination.
BACKGROUND
The current ordinance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cleveland Area Board of Realtors v. The City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Cleveland Area Board of Realtors v. The City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996