Legal Opinion

Prus v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 21, 1989No. 84 C 8626PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PLUNKETT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Louis Prus and the Northwest Side Real Estate Board bring a constitutional challenge to Defendant City of Chicago’s ordinance regulating commercial advertising in certain residential neighborhoods. Currently before us is Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we find the ordinance to be unconstitutional, and therefore grant summary judgment on the constitutional issue. The issues of damages and attorney’s fees, however, are reserved for later determination.

BACKGROUND

The current ordinance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Area Board of Realtors v. The City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Cleveland Area Board of Realtors v. The City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API